tokio-rs/mio
What happens to a stranger's pull request here, in the Porchlamp snapshot of 14 October 2026.
Outside pull requests to mio got a first human reply in a median of 10.3 hours (41 pull requests, 10 April to 7 October 2026); 20% got none within 14 days. It ranks 130 of 3,833 overall and 329 of 1,968 for first-time contributors.
Rating
- Score: 68.82
- Coverage: 100% · Full
- Tier: B
- Quadrant: Sweet Spot
- Ecosystem: crates.io (Rust)
Five pillars
| Pillar | Score | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness | 81.8 | 100% |
| Criticality | 74.7 | 100% |
| Governance | 68.0 | 100% |
| Rigor | 61.8 | 100% |
| Accessibility | 45.5 | 100% |
Rank in each lens
| Lens | Standing |
|---|---|
| Balanced | Rank 130 of 3,833 |
| First-timer | Rank 329 of 1,968 |
| Career capital | Rank 84 of 823 |
| Senior systems | Rank 62 of 1,206 |
| AI-assisted | Rank 162 of 3,929 |
The measured parameters
| Parameter | Value | Count | Window | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to First Response | 10.2942 | 41 | 10 April to 7 October 2026 | Median hours from an outside pull request opening to its first substantive human reply. |
| Decision Rate (90d) | 1 | 13 | 10 April to 9 July 2026 | Share of outside pull requests that were merged or closed within 90 days. |
| First-timer Merge Rate | 0.6111 | 18 | — | Share of first-time outside authors' decided pull requests that were merged. |
| PR Ghost Rate (14d) | 0.2 | 35 | 16 April to 13 October 2026 | Share of outside pull requests with no maintainer response, merge or close within 14 days. |
| Time to Merge (p90) | 464.9994 | 22 | 10 April to 7 October 2026 | Hours within which 90% of merged outside pull requests were merged. |
| Dependents | 546 | — | — | Packages in the registry that depend on this project, counted once each. |
| OpenSSF Criticality | 0.4614 | — | — | OpenSSF criticality score from 0 to 1, computed from the project's public activity signals. |
| Monthly Downloads | 88300992 | — | — | Downloads from the package registry in a month. |
| Legal IP Regime | NONE | — | — | The contributor licence regime: DCO, none, a foundation CLA or a corporate CLA. |
| Elephant Factor | 3 | 88 | — | The fewest organisations that account for half of the last year's commits. |
| Promotion Ladder | AD_HOC | — | — | How openly a contributor can become a maintainer, from closed to verified. |
| Pipeline Defenses | 72.5 | — | — | How well the project's build and review pipeline defends against bad changes, 0 to 100. |
| AI Policy Posture | AD_HOC | — | — | Whether the project has a written policy on AI-assisted contributions. |
| Substantive Review Rate | 0.5556 | 36 | 10 April to 7 October 2026 | Share of decided pull requests that received a substantive review. |
| Newcomer Issue Supply | 0 | — | — | Open, unassigned, up-to-date issues marked for newcomers. |
| Newcomer Conversion | 0.5385 | 13 | — | Share of first-time authors whose first pull request merged within 180 days. |
| Newcomer Return Rate | 0 | 7 | — | Share of those merged first-time authors who sent a second pull request within 90 days. |
| Developer Experience | 70 | 30 | — | Developer experience, 0 to 100: half CI run time, half setup signals. |
Similar projects
The ranked projects nearest this one in the same ecosystem.
- NVIDIA/OpenShell (rank 125)
- numaproj/numaflow (rank 126)
- rust-lang/rust-clippy (rank 128)
- bytecodealliance/wasmtime (rank 129)
- quinn-rs/quinn (rank 135)
Evidence
- Snapshot 2026-10-14, data as of 13 October 2026.
- Record hash:
f029b93d0625a79065606eeae0f12cb7a1f9fe4ccd430be860561726bd96634b - The full record is in data/2026-10-14/repos/25.json, under the key
tokio-rs/mio. - How every number is measured: Porchlamp methodology.
Is something wrong?
Open an issue about this record and say what looks wrong.