quartz-scheduler/quartz
What happens to a stranger's pull request here, in the Porchlamp snapshot of 17 October 2026.
Outside pull requests to quartz-scheduler/quartz got a first human reply in a median of 6.6 days (17 pull requests, 19 April to 16 October 2026). The share with no reply within 14 days has too small a sample to measure (8 pull requests counted; 10 needed). It ranks 2,604 of 3,219 overall. It is not ranked for first-time contributors: not enough evidence to show under this lens.
| Rank | 2,604 of 3,219 |
|---|---|
| Score | 41.11 |
| Tier | C |
| Median first reply | 6.6 days (159.4 hours) |
| 14-day no-reply share | — |
| First-timer rank | Not enough evidence to show under this lens. |
| Ecosystem | Java |
| Window | 19 April to 16 October 2026 |
Composite
- Rank
- 2,604 of 3,219
- Score
- 41.11
- Tier
- C
- Coverage
- 83% · Ceiling A
- Quadrant
- Crucible
Coordinates: leverage 54.3 (coverage 100%), friction 71.2 (coverage 67%)
Five pillars
| Pillar | Score | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness | 5.4 | 40% |
| Criticality | 68.0 | 100% |
| Governance | 55.8 | 100% |
| Rigor | 30.3 | 100% |
| Accessibility | 47.1 | 85% |
The measured parameters
Responsiveness
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Rate (90d)Share of outside pull requests that were merged or closed within 90 days. | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | ||||
| PR Ghost Rate (14d)Share of outside pull requests with no maintainer response, merge or close within 14 days. | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | ||||
| First-timer Merge RateShare of first-time outside authors' decided pull requests that were merged. | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | ||||
| Time to First ResponseMedian hours from an outside pull request opening to its first substantive human reply. | 159.4 hours (6.6 days) | 6.7 | 17 | 19 April to 16 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Time to Merge (p90)Hours within which 90% of merged outside pull requests were merged. | 2223.4 hours (92.6 days) | 1.4 | 16 | 19 April to 16 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
Criticality
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DependentsPackages in the registry that depend on this project, counted once each. | 1,821 | 87.4 | — | — | primaryraw/dependents/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Monthly DownloadsDownloads from the package registry in a month. | Not shown: Not applicable | ||||
| OpenSSF CriticalityOpenSSF criticality score from 0 to 1, computed from the project's public activity signals. | 0.4585 | 45.9 | — | — | primaryraw/github_meta/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
Governance
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant FactorThe fewest organisations that account for half of the last year's commits. | 1 | 25.0 | 72 | — | primaryraw/commits_365d/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Legal IP RegimeThe contributor licence regime: DCO, none, a foundation CLA or a corporate CLA. | Sign-off on commits (DCO) | 100.0 | — | — | primaryraw/governance/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Promotion LadderHow openly a contributor can become a maintainer, from closed to verified. | No written path to becoming a maintainer | 40.0 | — | — | primaryraw/governance/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
Rigor
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Policy PostureWhether the project has a written policy on AI-assisted contributions. | No written AI policy | 40.0 | — | — | primaryraw/governance/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Pipeline DefensesHow well the project's build and review pipeline defends against bad changes, 0 to 100. | 42.5 | 42.5 | — | — | primaryraw/scorecard/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Substantive Review RateShare of decided pull requests that received a substantive review. | 3.6% | 4.5 | 28 | 19 April to 16 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
Accessibility
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer ExperienceDeveloper experience, 0 to 100: half CI run time, half setup signals. | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | ||||
| Newcomer ConversionShare of first-time authors whose first pull request merged within 180 days. | 50.0% | 100.0 | 10 | — | primaryraw/author_history/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Newcomer Issue SupplyOpen, unassigned, up-to-date issues marked for newcomers. | 0 | 0.0 | — | — | primaryraw/gfi/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
| Newcomer Return RateShare of those merged first-time authors who sent a second pull request within 90 days. | 16.7% | 33.3 | 6 | — | primaryraw/author_history/quartz-scheduler__quartz.json |
Persona view
| Persona | Rank | Score | Tier | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | 2,604 of 3,219 | 41.11 | C | Rated |
| First-timer | Not enough evidence to show under this lens. | |||
| Career capital | 749 of 798 | 45.69 | C | Rated |
| Senior systems | Fewer than 3 organizations account for most commits (not multi-vendor). | |||
| AI-assisted | 3,226 of 3,696 | 38.36 | D | Rated |
Integrity
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-17
- Raw hash
- 25b186547901e683c8102737405f97e53c4b9e896d8879d7493a8c88de6eb323
No suspicion flags on this repository.
The full record is in data/2026-10-17/repos/ae.json, under the key quartz-scheduler/quartz.
How every number is measured: Porchlamp methodology.
Open an issue about this record and say what looks wrong.
Porchlamp (2026). quartz-scheduler/quartz. Snapshot 2026-10-17. https://porchlamp.org/projects/quartz-scheduler/quartz/. CC BY 4.0.
Similar projects
The ranked projects nearest this one in the same ecosystem.
- google/guice (rank 2,572)
- halo-dev/halo (rank 2,603)
- jhy/jsoup (rank 2,610)
- hazelcast/hazelcast (rank 2,638)
- xpipe-io/xpipe (rank 2,642)