Maxteabag/sqlit
What happens to a stranger's pull request here, in the Porchlamp snapshot of 17 October 2026.
Outside pull requests to Maxteabag/sqlit got a first human reply in a median of 8.4 days (16 pull requests, 19 April to 16 October 2026); 34% got none within 14 days. It ranks 2,714 of 3,219 overall. For first-time contributors it ranks 1,340 of 1,525 (the bottom 13%).
| Rank | 2,714 of 3,219 |
|---|---|
| Score | 39.61 |
| Tier | D |
| Median first reply | 8.4 days (201.8 hours) |
| 14-day no-reply share | 34% |
| First-timer rank | 1,340 of 1,525 |
| Ecosystem | Python |
| Window | 19 April to 16 October 2026 |
Composite
- Rank
- 2,714 of 3,219
- Score
- 39.61
- Tier
- D
- Coverage
- 100% · Full
- Quadrant
- Graveyard
Coordinates: leverage 29.9 (coverage 100%), friction 50.6 (coverage 100%)
Five pillars
| Pillar | Score | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness | 48.4 | 100% |
| Criticality | 24.1 | 100% |
| Governance | 50.5 | 100% |
| Rigor | 25.9 | 100% |
| Accessibility | 50.1 | 100% |
The measured parameters
Responsiveness
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Rate (90d)Share of outside pull requests that were merged or closed within 90 days. | 85.7% | 100.0 | 21 | 19 April to 18 July 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| PR Ghost Rate (14d)Share of outside pull requests with no maintainer response, merge or close within 14 days. | 34.2% | 31.6 | 38 | 20 April to 17 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| First-timer Merge RateShare of first-time outside authors' decided pull requests that were merged. | 54.3% | 67.9 | 35 | — | primaryraw/author_history/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Time to First ResponseMedian hours from an outside pull request opening to its first substantive human reply. | 201.8 hours (8.4 days) | 0.0 | 16 | 19 April to 16 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Time to Merge (p90)Hours within which 90% of merged outside pull requests were merged. | 320.0 hours (13.3 days) | 50.9 | 21 | 19 April to 16 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
Criticality
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DependentsPackages in the registry that depend on this project, counted once each. | 0 | 15.9 | — | — | primaryraw/dependents/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Monthly DownloadsDownloads from the package registry in a month. | 3,173 downloads a month | 20.2 | — | — | primaryraw/downloads/pypi__sqlit.json |
| OpenSSF CriticalityOpenSSF criticality score from 0 to 1, computed from the project's public activity signals. | 0.3623 | 36.2 | — | — | primaryraw/github_meta/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
Governance
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant FactorThe fewest organisations that account for half of the last year's commits. | 1 | 25.0 | 582 | — | primaryraw/commits_365d/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Legal IP RegimeThe contributor licence regime: DCO, none, a foundation CLA or a corporate CLA. | No CLA or sign-off found | 85.0 | — | — | primaryraw/governance/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Promotion LadderHow openly a contributor can become a maintainer, from closed to verified. | No written path to becoming a maintainer | 40.0 | — | — | primaryraw/governance/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
Rigor
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Policy PostureWhether the project has a written policy on AI-assisted contributions. | No written AI policy | 40.0 | — | — | primaryraw/governance/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Pipeline DefensesHow well the project's build and review pipeline defends against bad changes, 0 to 100. | 34.6667 | 34.7 | 82 | — | proxy:review_ciraw/pr_window/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Substantive Review RateShare of decided pull requests that received a substantive review. | 0.0% | 0.0 | 31 | 19 April to 16 October 2026 | primaryraw/pr_window/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
Accessibility
| Parameter | Value | Score | Count | Window | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer ExperienceDeveloper experience, 0 to 100: half CI run time, half setup signals. | 85 | 85.0 | 30 | — | primaryraw/actions_runs/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Newcomer ConversionShare of first-time authors whose first pull request merged within 180 days. | 65.0% | 100.0 | 20 | — | primaryraw/author_history/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Newcomer Issue SupplyOpen, unassigned, up-to-date issues marked for newcomers. | 0 | 0.0 | — | — | primaryraw/gfi/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
| Newcomer Return RateShare of those merged first-time authors who sent a second pull request within 90 days. | 7.7% | 15.4 | 13 | — | primaryraw/author_history/Maxteabag__sqlit.json |
Persona view
| Persona | Rank | Score | Tier | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | 2,714 of 3,219 | 39.61 | D | Rated |
| First-timer | 1,340 of 1,525 | 44.53 | C | Rated |
| Career capital | This repository's production-criticality signal is not yet high enough for career-capital ranking. | |||
| Senior systems | Fewer than 3 organizations account for most commits (not multi-vendor). | |||
| AI-assisted | 3,380 of 3,696 | 36.13 | D | Rated |
Integrity
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-17
- Raw hash
- 0c56d27bdd3280331e238a890286cb34b5e8890dd157d08e23445a485a38e668
No suspicion flags on this repository.
The full record is in data/2026-10-17/repos/74.json, under the key Maxteabag/sqlit.
How every number is measured: Porchlamp methodology.
Open an issue about this record and say what looks wrong.
Porchlamp (2026). Maxteabag/sqlit. Snapshot 2026-10-17. https://porchlamp.org/projects/maxteabag/sqlit/. CC BY 4.0.
Similar projects
The ranked projects nearest this one in the same ecosystem.
- lucidrains/x-transformers (rank 2,709)
- hylang/hy (rank 2,715)
- pycaret/pycaret (rank 2,718)
- ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF (rank 2,720)
- platformio/platformio-core (rank 2,721)