Keats/validator
What happens to a stranger's pull request here, in the Porchlamp snapshot of 14 October 2026.
The reply time and the share with no reply within 14 days both have too small a sample to measure (0 and 5 pull requests counted; 10 needed). It ranks 112 of 3,833 overall. It is not ranked for first-time contributors: not enough evidence to show under this lens.
Rating
- Score: 69.32
- Coverage: 66% · Ceiling B
- Tier: B (capped)
- Quadrant: Sweet Spot
- Ecosystem: crates.io (Rust)
Capped: this tier can go no higher until more of the project's inputs are measured. It reflects how much data there is, not how good the score is.
Five pillars
| Pillar | Score | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness | 100.0 | 20% |
| Criticality | 65.5 | 100% |
| Governance | 64.2 | 65% |
| Rigor | 47.1 | 70% |
| Accessibility | 53.5 | 85% |
Rank in each lens
| Lens | Standing |
|---|---|
| Balanced | Rank 112 of 3,833 |
| First-timer | Not ranked: Not enough evidence to show under this lens. |
| Career capital | Rank 85 of 823 |
| Senior systems | Rank 161 of 1,206 |
| AI-assisted | Rank 336 of 3,929 |
The measured parameters
| Parameter | Value | Count | Window | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to First Response | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | Median hours from an outside pull request opening to its first substantive human reply. |
| Decision Rate (90d) | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | Share of outside pull requests that were merged or closed within 90 days. |
| First-timer Merge Rate | 1 | 6 | — | Share of first-time outside authors' decided pull requests that were merged. |
| PR Ghost Rate (14d) | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | Share of outside pull requests with no maintainer response, merge or close within 14 days. |
| Time to Merge (p90) | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | Hours within which 90% of merged outside pull requests were merged. |
| Dependents | 231 | — | — | Packages in the registry that depend on this project, counted once each. |
| OpenSSF Criticality | 0.3555 | — | — | OpenSSF criticality score from 0 to 1, computed from the project's public activity signals. |
| Monthly Downloads | 4636556 | — | — | Downloads from the package registry in a month. |
| Legal IP Regime | NONE | — | — | The contributor licence regime: DCO, none, a foundation CLA or a corporate CLA. |
| Elephant Factor | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | The fewest organisations that account for half of the last year's commits. |
| Promotion Ladder | AD_HOC | — | — | How openly a contributor can become a maintainer, from closed to verified. |
| Pipeline Defenses | 52.5 | — | — | How well the project's build and review pipeline defends against bad changes, 0 to 100. |
| AI Policy Posture | AD_HOC | — | — | Whether the project has a written policy on AI-assisted contributions. |
| Substantive Review Rate | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | Share of decided pull requests that received a substantive review. |
| Newcomer Issue Supply | 0 | — | — | Open, unassigned, up-to-date issues marked for newcomers. |
| Newcomer Conversion | 0.5 | 6 | — | Share of first-time authors whose first pull request merged within 180 days. |
| Newcomer Return Rate | Not shown: Insufficient sample size | — | — | Share of those merged first-time authors who sent a second pull request within 90 days. |
| Developer Experience | 70 | 8 | — | Developer experience, 0 to 100: half CI run time, half setup signals. |
Similar projects
The ranked projects nearest this one in the same ecosystem.
- ratatui/ratatui (rank 102)
- hyperium/hyper (rank 106)
- tokio-rs/axum (rank 110)
- GuillaumeGomez/sysinfo (rank 118)
- NVIDIA/OpenShell (rank 125)
Evidence
- Snapshot 2026-10-14, data as of 13 October 2026.
- Record hash:
714ad0d82a217d0acd69e786e1c469ca6b61ba34c557afeccf50f29d8edf55b9 - The full record is in data/2026-10-14/repos/cc.json, under the key
Keats/validator. - How every number is measured: Porchlamp methodology.
Is something wrong?
Open an issue about this record and say what looks wrong.