Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium
What happens to a stranger's pull request here, in the Porchlamp snapshot of 14 October 2026.
Outside pull requests to Gymnasium got a first human reply in a median of 22.8 hours (92 pull requests, 10 April to 7 October 2026); 16% got none within 14 days. It ranks 217 of 3,833 overall and 346 of 1,968 for first-time contributors.
Rating
- Score: 66.71
- Coverage: 100% · Full
- Tier: B
- Quadrant: Sweet Spot
- Ecosystem: PyPI
Five pillars
| Pillar | Score | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness | 80.3 | 100% |
| Criticality | 68.9 | 100% |
| Governance | 73.3 | 100% |
| Rigor | 47.8 | 100% |
| Accessibility | 50.6 | 100% |
Rank in each lens
| Lens | Standing |
|---|---|
| Balanced | Rank 217 of 3,833 |
| First-timer | Rank 346 of 1,968 |
| Career capital | Rank 131 of 823 |
| Senior systems | Rank 141 of 1,206 |
| AI-assisted | Rank 492 of 3,929 |
The measured parameters
| Parameter | Value | Count | Window | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to First Response | 22.7538 | 92 | 10 April to 7 October 2026 | Median hours from an outside pull request opening to its first substantive human reply. |
| Decision Rate (90d) | 0.8696 | 23 | 10 April to 9 July 2026 | Share of outside pull requests that were merged or closed within 90 days. |
| First-timer Merge Rate | 0.6364 | 33 | — | Share of first-time outside authors' decided pull requests that were merged. |
| PR Ghost Rate (14d) | 0.1584 | 101 | 16 April to 13 October 2026 | Share of outside pull requests with no maintainer response, merge or close within 14 days. |
| Time to Merge (p90) | 184.1247 | 81 | 10 April to 7 October 2026 | Hours within which 90% of merged outside pull requests were merged. |
| Dependents | 316 | — | — | Packages in the registry that depend on this project, counted once each. |
| OpenSSF Criticality | 0.476 | — | — | OpenSSF criticality score from 0 to 1, computed from the project's public activity signals. |
| Monthly Downloads | 3601211 | — | — | Downloads from the package registry in a month. |
| Legal IP Regime | FOUNDATION_CLA | — | — | The contributor licence regime: DCO, none, a foundation CLA or a corporate CLA. |
| Elephant Factor | 13 | 160 | — | The fewest organisations that account for half of the last year's commits. |
| Promotion Ladder | AD_HOC | — | — | How openly a contributor can become a maintainer, from closed to verified. |
| Pipeline Defenses | 70 | — | — | How well the project's build and review pipeline defends against bad changes, 0 to 100. |
| AI Policy Posture | AD_HOC | — | — | Whether the project has a written policy on AI-assisted contributions. |
| Substantive Review Rate | 0.2083 | 96 | 10 April to 7 October 2026 | Share of decided pull requests that received a substantive review. |
| Newcomer Issue Supply | 2 | — | — | Open, unassigned, up-to-date issues marked for newcomers. |
| Newcomer Conversion | 0.5294 | 17 | — | Share of first-time authors whose first pull request merged within 180 days. |
| Newcomer Return Rate | 0.1111 | 9 | — | Share of those merged first-time authors who sent a second pull request within 90 days. |
| Developer Experience | 35 | 24 | — | Developer experience, 0 to 100: half CI run time, half setup signals. |
Similar projects
The ranked projects nearest this one in the same ecosystem.
- ultralytics/ultralytics (rank 203)
- spyder-ide/spyder (rank 208)
- internetarchive/openlibrary (rank 211)
- psf/black (rank 215)
- python/typeshed (rank 222)
Evidence
- Snapshot 2026-10-14, data as of 13 October 2026.
- Record hash:
b7b23dbbc6aeca18c293ea9cf26175c6161fe85e1da5c8a5bf55e4d1c2154243 - The full record is in data/2026-10-14/repos/dd.json, under the key
Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium. - How every number is measured: Porchlamp methodology.
Is something wrong?
Open an issue about this record and say what looks wrong.